Effect of Upright Posture on Endothelial Function in Women and Men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Women are more prone to orthostatic intolerance compared to men and have a greater vasodilatory capacity. We investigated the hypothesis that women would have greater peripheral flow-mediated dilation (FMD) while in the upright posture compared to men, which could contribute to this phenomenon. In young healthy women (age: 20 ± 3, BMI: 27 ± 5 kg/m 2 , n = 10) and men (age = 21 ± 2, BMI: 27 ± 8 kg/m 2 , n = 8), we assessed FMD of the brachial artery and hemodynamics to determine endothelial function during the supine and 70° head-up tilt postures (randomized). The brachial artery was kept at heart level in both trials. We observed that FMD increased in both sexes during tilt (Women: 11.9 ± 5.3 to 15.7 ± 5.6%; Men: 8.4 ± 3.2 to 14.6 ± 3.4%, Main effect of tilt p = 0.005) which was not due to changes in blood pressure or shear stress. There were no interaction effects between sex and posture. In a second cohort of women (age: 22 ± 3, BMI: 23 ± 3 kg/m 2 , n = 9) and men (age: 22 ± 2, BMI: 25 ± 8 kg/m 2 , n = 8), we investigated reactive hyperemia by peripheral arterial tonometry (LnRHI) via EndoPAT. Interestingly, we found that the EndoPAT response was decreased in both sexes during tilt (LnRHI: Men: 0.70 ± 0.28 to 0.59 ± 0.40, Women: 0.52 ± 0.23 to 0.30 ± 0.32, Main effect of tilt p = 0.037). We previously found that FMD is related to coronary responses to acetylcholine and adenosine whereas EndoPAT is related to coronary responses to dobutamine. Therefore, we suggest that sympathetic mediated dilation is attenuated in the upright posture while the increased vasodilatory response as measured by FMD in the tilt posture could be attributed to increasing metabolite production from postural muscles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".