MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226364830 · doi:10.1017/s0022029922000280

Use of batch anion exchange technique for separation of κ-casein glycomacropeptide from bovine whey fraction

2022· article· en· W4226364830 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProteins in Food Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFraction (chemistry)Ion exchangePhenylalanineSialic acidResidue (chemistry)ElutionIon chromatographyAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bovine κ-casein glycomacropeptide (GMP) is a sialic acid containing glycopeptide, which is considered as a health promoting compound found in cheese whey. The study described in this research communication was undertaken to determine whether GMP with undetectable level of contaminating protein or phenylalanine can be isolated from bovine whey fraction using batch anion exchange technique with chitin as an adsorbent. A soluble whey fraction (SWF) prepared from 1 g whey protein isolate (WPI) was mixed with a slurry of 1 g chitin, and the mixture was incubated at pH 3.0. After incubation, the mixture was filtered, and the residue obtained (containing chitin-GMP complex) was washed with water and eluted stepwise with 0.5 M NaCl and 2.0 M NaCl. Most of GMP (corresponding to 75.8% of total sialic acid recovered) was eluted with 0.5 M NaCl. The recovered GMP accounted for 5.4% dry weight of WPI (or 18.9% dry weight of SWF). Amino acid analysis showed that there was no detectable level of contaminating amino acids including phenylalanine, histidine, arginine and tyrosine in the GMP fraction. It was concluded that the batch anion exchange method with chitin developed in this study can be used for the isolation of high purity GMP from bovine SWF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ResearchSame topicProteins in Food SystemsFrench-language works237,207