MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226364838 · doi:10.1287/moor.2023.0035

Optimal Partition for a Multi-Type Queueing System

2025· preprint· en· W4226364838 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Operations Research · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueuePartition (number theory)Computer scienceProbabilistic logicQueueing theoryMathematical optimizationDecision makerOperations researchComputer networkMathematicsCombinatoricsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study an optimal server partition and customer assignment problem for an uncapacitated first-come-first-served queueing system with heterogeneous types of customers. Each type of customer is associated with a Poisson arrival, a certain service time distribution, and a unit waiting cost. The goal is to minimize the expected total waiting cost by partitioning the server into subqueues, each with a smaller service capacity, and routing customer types probabilistically. First, we show that by properly partitioning the queue, it is possible to reduce the expected waiting costs by an arbitrarily large ratio. Then, we show that for any given server partition, the optimal customer assignment admits a certain geometric structure, enabling an efficient algorithm to find the optimal assignment. Such an optimal structure also applies when minimizing the expected sojourn time. Finally, we consider the joint partition-assignment optimization problem. The customer assignment under the optimal server partition admits a stronger structure. Specifically, if the first two moments of the service time distributions satisfy certain properties, it is optimal to deterministically assign customer types with consecutive service rates to the same subqueue. This structure allows for more efficient algorithms. Overall, the common rule of thumb to partition customers into continuous segments ranked by service rates could be suboptimal, and our work is the first to comprehensively study the queue partition problem based on customer types. Funding: Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72192830, 72192832, 71825003, 72394361, and 72425013] and the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Mathematical Foundations for Artificial Intelligence [Grant 2023B1212010001] is gratefully acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0035 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.180
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it