Tracking of Radar Targets With In-Band Wireless Communication Interference in RadComm Spectrum Sharing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radar and communication system (RadComm) spectrum sharing has received considerable attention from the research community in recent years. This paper considers the distributed radars present in the surveillance region with multiple in-band wireless communication transmitters (IWCTs). A new measurement model is proposed by considering both radar returns and returns due to IWCTs. The tracking performance is evaluated using the global nearest neighbor (GNN) tracker with an extended Kalman filter (EKF) for the received measurement set. A single radar case is considered, where near geometry scenario (IWCTs are placed near the radar and target) and far-geometry scenario (IWCTs are placed far from the radar and target) are considered to evaluate the tracking performance. It is observed that a large number of tracks are resulted due to IWCTs, and identifying the actual target track is ambiguous in a single radar case. Therefore, in the second case, multiple radars are placed to investigate the problem comprehensively. The track-to-track association (T2TA) is performed to identify the true target track on multiple tracks produced owing to the presence of IWCTs and the resulting tracks from all radars pertaining to the true targets. Once the true target tracks from each radar are identified, using the T2TA, the track-to-track fusion (T2TF) is carried out to improve the estimates of the true target. The simulation results are quantified with position root mean square error (PRMSE). The posterior Cramer–Rao lower bounds (PCRLBs) quantifying the achievable estimation accuracies are also presented. The simulation results reveal that the association and fusion of tracks from multiple radars identify the true target track with good accuracy and overcome the inability to determine the true track, as in the case of a single radar. Further, the results disclose that, as the number of radars increases, the T2TA and fusion improved the PRMSE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it