MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226428294 · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005956

A Prospective, Cohort Study of the Effect of Acute and Chronic Malnutrition on Length of Stay in Children Having Surgery in Rwanda

2022· article· en· W4226428294 on OpenAlexaff
Celestin Seneza, Daniel I. McIsaac, Théogène Twagirumugabe, M. Dylan Bould

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsCanadian Network for Innovation in EducationUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWastingMedicineMalnutritionInterquartile rangeProspective cohort studyPediatricsCohortMalnutrition in childrenCohort studyConfidence intervalSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in pediatric surgical patients, but there are little data from low-income countries that estimate the association of malnutrition with surgical outcomes. We aimed to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and its association with length of stay (LOS) among pediatric surgical patients in Kigali, Rwanda. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study. We enrolled surgical patients between 1 month and 15 years of age. We measured the association of acute malnutrition (wasting) and chronic malnutrition (stunting) with postoperative LOS using log-gamma regression to account for the skewed LOS distribution. Adjustment was made for sex, age, elective versus emergency surgery, household income, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. RESULTS: Of 593 children, 124 children (21.2%) had acute malnutrition (wasting) with 39 (6.6%) severely wasted. A total of 160 (26.9%) children had chronic malnutrition (stunting), with 81 (13.7%) severely stunted. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) LOS after surgery was 2 (1-5) days for children with mild/no wasting, 6 (2.5-12.5) days for children with moderate wasting, and 6 (2-15) days with severe wasting. Median (IQR) LOS after surgery was 2 (1-6) days for children with mild/no stunting, 3 (1-3) days for children with moderate stunting, and 5 (2.3-11.8) days with severe stunting malnutrition. After adjustment for confounders, the moderate wasting was associated with increased LOS, with ratio of means (RoM), 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.0; P < .0001. Severe wasting was not associated with increased LOS (RoM, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.7; P = .12). Severe, but not moderate, stunting was associated with increased LOS (RoM, 1.9; 1.5-2.4; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition is prevalent in >20% of children presenting for surgery and associated with increased LOS after surgery, even after accounting for individual and family-level confounders. Although some aspects of malnutrition may relate to the surgical condition, severe malnutrition may represent a modifiable social risk factor that could be targeted to improve postoperative outcomes and resource use. Severely stunted children should be identified as at risk of having delayed recovery after surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207