MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226498475 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aca236

Generalized quasi-topological gravities: the whole shebang

2022· article· en· W4226498475 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Bueno, Pablo A. Cano, Robie A. Hennigar, Mengqi Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloVlaamse regeringPontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean Commission
KeywordsOrder (exchange)EmbeddingPhysicsCurvatureFunction (biology)EinsteinAlgebraic numberTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical physicsMathematical analysisCombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Generalized quasi-topological gravities (GQTGs) are higher-curvature extensions of Einstein gravity in D -dimensions. Their defining properties include possessing second-order linearized equations of motion around maximally symmetric backgrounds as well as non-hairy generalizations of Schwarzschild’s black hole characterized by a single function, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≡</mml:mo> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , which satisfies a second-order differential equation. In (Bueno et al 2020 Class. Quantum Grav. 37 015002) GQTGs were shown to exist at all orders in curvature and for general D . In this paper we prove that, in fact, n − 1 inequivalent classes (as far as static and spherically symmetric solutions are concerned) of order- n GQTGs exist for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⩾</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Amongst these, we show that one—and only one—type of densities is of the quasi-topological kind, namely, such that the equation for f ( r ) is algebraic. Our arguments do not work for D = 4, in which case there seems to be a single unique GQT density at each order which is not of the quasi-topological kind. We compute the thermodynamic charges of the most general D -dimensional order- n GQTG, verify that they satisfy the first law and provide evidence that they can be entirely written in terms of the embedding function which determines the maximally symmetric vacua of the theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207