MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226505397 · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwac082

Cambrian explosion fossils from the North China craton

2022· article· en· W4226505397 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Bernard Caron

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Science Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCratonChinaGeologyPaleontologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our understanding of the Cambrian explosion has relied heavily on a few exceptional fossil deposits preserving soft-bodied animals, the so-called Burgess-Shale-type deposits, or BSTs for short. BSTs are named after the famous Canadian fossil deposit discovered by Charles Walcott in 1909. Regardless of where they come from or their age, all BSTs preserve soft-bodied fossils as carbonaceous remains. The distribution of these sites [1] and the number of taxa recovered at each one vary greatly owing to local biostratinomic controls [2], differences in sampling efforts and community variations over temporal and stratigraphic scales [3,4]. Although ∼20 major BSTs are now known globally, most BSTs are still restricted to two major terranes: Laurentia and South China. These terranes represent stratigraphically separate units, of which the most famous and diverse BSTs are the Burgess Shale in Canada and the Chengjiang biota, discovered in South China in 1984. The rarity of BSTs, particularly high-diversity BSTs, as well as of contemporaneous BSTs from other terranes, limits our ability to investigate global temporal and paleobiogeographic patterns of soft-bodied faunal assemblages more thoroughly. New research by Sun et al. formally describes the faunal composition of a new middle Cambrian (Drumian) BST, the Linyi Lagerstätte, named after the town of Linyi in Shandong Province [5]. This finding is significant because it is from the North China terrane and it is the youngest of all Cambrian BSTs found in China so far, equivalent in age to the Wheeler Formation in Utah (USA). The Linyi Lagerstätte also nicely complements earlier reports of BST fossils such as Isoxys [6], Sidneyia [7] and Cambroraster [8] found near Weifang, a few dozen kilometers to the north of Linyi in Shandong Province. Belonging to the underlying Mantou Formation, this BST is still awaiting a proper quantitative investigation of its faunal assemblage. The reported taxonomic diversity and quality of preservation of fossils from the Linyi Lagerstätte (N = 35) is certainly unremarkable when compared to the Burgess Shale or the Chengjiang biota, but considering that this study is based on limited samples (ca. 3000 specimens) from just a few small recent excavations, the Linyi Lagerstätte holds great promise for new discoveries. Among the most remarkable soft-bodied species discovered at the Linyi site are arthropods, including Cordaticaris striatus, a newly described radiodont [9]. The Linyi Lagerstätte also includes two species, including one new species, of the very rare arthropod Thelxiope. Only a handful of specimens of this genus are known globally. Although the specimens recovered so far do show new features, but are not very well-preserved, there is hope that future specimens will yield more information. The detailed approach that the authors took in documenting this new BST, counting all specimens from recent systematic excavations, allowed them to compare the Linyi Lagerstätte to other BSTs using quantitative analyses. Based on the preliminary results, the authors hypothesized that the Linyi Lagerstätte represents an intermediate fauna between East Gondwana and Laurentia—not surprising, considering that this fauna lived on a separate terrane between the two. The work on the Linyi Lagerstätte exemplifies the importance of continuing both well-conducted field explorations and detailed investigations to fill in important gaps in our knowledge of the evolution of the first animals. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNational Science ReviewSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207