MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4228996795 · doi:10.34883/pi.2022.25.1.007

The Structure of Cognitive Impairments in Patients with Sleep Apnea in the Acute Period of Cerebral Infarction

2022· article· ru· W4228996795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Е.В. Сереброва

Bibliographic record

VenueРецепт · 2022
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCognitionSleep apneaApneaCerebral infarctionRehabilitationCognitive impairmentAnesthesiaInternal medicinePediatricsPhysical therapyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Цель исследования. Изучить влияние апноэ во сне на структуру когнитивных нарушений у пациентов в остром периоде инфаркта мозга.Материалы и методы. Проведено исследование когнитивных функций по Монреальской шкале оценки когнитивных функций в остром периоде инфаркта мозга (ИМ) 74 пациентам с апноэ во сне (АС) и 40 пациентам без АС. В основной группе 20 пациентам в течение 7–10 дней выполнялась СИПАП-терапия.Результаты. У пациентов с АС наблюдались более выраженные, чем у пациентов без АС, нарушения зрительно-конструктивных/исполнительных навыков, внимания и отсроченного воспроизведения (р<0,05), при этом наиболее тяжелый когнитивный дефицит в данных сферах и абстракции выявлен у пациентов с тяжелой степенью АС (р<0,05). Значимое улучшение в сфере отсроченного воспроизведения установлено у пациентов, получавших СИПАП-терапию, в сравнении с остальными пациентами основной группы (р=0,001).Заключение. Пациенты с ИМ нуждаются в ранней диагностике АС и когнитивных нарушений для проведения своевременных лечебных и реабилитационных мероприятий. Objective. To study the effect of sleep apnea on the structure of cognitive impairment in patients in the acute period of cerebral infarction.Materials and methods. A study of cognitive functions according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the acute period of cerebral infarction (CI) was carried out in 74 patients with sleep apnea (SA) and 40 patients without SA. In the main group 20 patients underwent CPAP therapy.Results. In patients with SA, more pronounced disorders of visual-constructive/executive skills, attention and delayed reproduction (p<0.05) were observed than in patients without SA, while the most severe cognitive deficits in these areas and abstractions were found in patients with severe SA (p<0.05). A significant improvement in the field of delayed reproduction was found in patients receiving CPAP therapy in comparison with the rest of the patients in the main group (p=0.001).Conclusion. Patients with CI require early diagnosis of SA and cognitive impairment in order to carry out timely treatment and rehabilitation measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueРецептSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207