MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4228999540 · doi:10.25251/skin.6.supp.2

Guselkumab (GUS) in Psoriasis Patients With a History of Malignancy: 5-Year Safety From VOYAGE (VOY)1&2

2022· article· en· W4228999540 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Blauvelt, Diamant Thaçi, Kim Papp, Vincent Ho, Kamran Ghoreschi, Byung‐Soo Kim, Megan Miller, Yaung‐Kaung Shen, Yin You, Jenny Yu, Ya‐Wen Yang, Jeffrey Crowley, Peter Foley

Bibliographic record

VenueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaProbity Medical Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsoriasisMalignancyMedicineDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malignancy is a potential safety concern for all immunomodulatory biologics.Patients with a history of malignancy are often excluded from clinical trials, which limits the availability of safety data for biologics in this population 1,2• Guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23 p19 subunit inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis • VOYAGE 1 and 2 were Phase 3 studies that demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety of GUS in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis 3,4• These studies included a small number of patients with a history of malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]) at baseline with no evidence of recurrence for greater than 5 years prior to screening •This analysis examines malignancy and other serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in these patients through 5 years in VOYAGE 1 and 2 Patients With a History of Malignancy at Baseline • Of 1721 GUS-treated patients, 18 (1.0%)had a prior history of malignancy at baseline • Mean (SD) exposure to GUS during the VOYAGE 1 or 2 study=184 (87) weeks; median (range)=225.5 (20-254) weeks SAEs Other Than Malignancies• Of 18 patients with a prior history of malignancy at baseline, 5 had SAEs other than malignancies NMSC Events• From baseline to Week 264, NMSC was reported in 2 of 18 patients with a prior history of malignancy • Among 18 patients with a history of malignancy who were exposed to GUS for up to 5 years there were: o 2 new primary malignancies (papillary breast carcinoma and invasive melanoma) o 1 recurrence of bronchial carcinoma confounded by exposure to adalimumab • This analysis did not identify any new safety concerns that would limit the long-term use of GUS in patients with a history of malignancy • More patients and longer duration of follow-up are needed to better characterize the use of GUS in patients with a history of malignancy RESULTS Of these 18 patients, 3 experienced SAEs of malignancy while participating in VOYAGE 1 or 2 for up to 5 years *This is the same patient diagnosed with invasive melanoma (right forearm) on Day 1139.BCC=Basal cell carcinoma; GUS=Guselkumab; M=Male; NMSC=Non-melanoma skin cancer; VOY=VOYAGE; y=Years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine→Same topicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis→French-language works237,207→