Neonatal subchronic toxicity and in vitro genotoxicity studies of the human‐identical milk oligosaccharide 3‐fucosyllactose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human milk oligosaccharides, such as 3-fucosyllactose (3-FL), are bioactive components of breast milk associated with benefits for infant growth and development. Structurally identical compounds (human-identical milk oligosaccharides-HiMOs) can be produced using microbial fermentation, allowing their use in infant formula to increase its similarity with human milk. Toxicological studies are required to demonstrate safety of HiMOs and that of any impurities potentially carried over from the manufacturing process. Biotechnologically produced 3-FL was tested for potential genotoxicity (bacterial reverse mutation test and in vitro mammalian micronucleus test) and subchronic toxicity (90-day study with neonatal rats). In the 90-day study, 3-FL was administered by gavage to rats once daily from Day 7 of age, at doses up to 4000 mg/kg body weight (bw)/day (the maximum feasible dose), followed by a 4-week recovery period. Reference controls received 4000 mg/kg bw/day of oligofructose, an ingredient permitted for use in infant formula. Results for the genotoxicity studies were negative. In the 90-day study, there were no adverse effects of 3-FL on any of the parameters measured; thus, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was 4000 mg/kg bw/day (the highest dose tested). These results support the safety of biotechnologically produced 3-FL for use in infant formula and other foods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".