Geomorphological slope units of the Himalayas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Slope units represent surface slopes by means of polygons delimited by drainage and divide lines obtained on a digital topography. Objective slope unit delineation for a given digital elevation model is still an open issue and, often, a limitation that may dictate the use of a more traditional pixel-based approach for spatial analysis. Availability of slope unit maps facilitates many kinds of studies and allows scholars to focus on specific scientific issues rather than on preparing sound mapping units from scratch for their research. Here, we present a slope unit map of a large portion of the Himalayas. The map is prepared following a widely tested, parameter-free optimization algorithm. The area encompassed by the map is relevant to studies of the well-known 2015 Gorkha earthquake and monsoons, which makes it relevant to a vast portion of the scientific community working in natural hazards including, but not limited to, landslide scientists and practitioners. The map contains 112,674 polygons with average area of 0.38 km2 and is published in vector form. The map is accompanied by a selection of data including morphometric and thematic quantities. In addition to describing the rationale behind the delineation of the polygonal map and selected data, we describe an application devoted to unsupervised terrain classification. We applied a k-means clustering procedure with two strategies: one at (coarser) basin scale and one at (finer) slope unit scale. We show similarities and differences between the two classification strategies, highlighting the role of the slope unit subdivision in the two cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it