MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229045782 · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1745306

COMPARING OUTCOMES OF ERCP UNDER CONSCIOUS SEDATION TO GENERAL ANESTHESIA

2022· article· en· W4229045782 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aneta Bąk, B. C. Parker, VIVIAN NGUYEN, K. Harding, Joël Perren, B. Yee, W. Richardson, M. Grey, G. Greaves, Rafael Perini

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSedationContext (archaeology)PerforationAnesthesiaPancreatitisStandard of careAnesthesiologyEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyGeneral surgerySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims In Canada, ERCP performed under conscious sedation (CS) is the standard of care but is limited by patient movement and agitation, especially in the context of lengthy or technically complex cases. General anesthesia (GA) may optimize patient comfort and safety while reducing complications such as pancreatitis, perforation, and mortality. In October 2017, Kelowna General Hospital (KGH), in British Columbia, Canada, transitioned the standard anesthesia modality for ERCP from CS to GA. This study investigated differences in complications and patient outcomes for ERCP performed under CS (n=1334) before the practice change compared to GA (n=899) after the practice change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207