21cmVAE: A Very Accurate Emulator of the 21 cm Global Signal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Considerable observational efforts are being dedicated to measuring the sky-averaged (global) 21 cm signal of neutral hydrogen from Cosmic Dawn and the Epoch of Reionization. Deriving observational constraints on the astrophysics of this era requires modeling tools that can quickly and accurately generate theoretical signals across the wide astrophysical parameter space. For this purpose artificial neural networks were used to create the only two existing global signal emulators, 21 cm GEM and globalemu . In this paper we introduce 21 cm VAE, a neural-network-based global signal emulator, trained on the same data set of ∼30,000 global signals as the other two emulators, but with a more direct prediction algorithm that prioritizes accuracy and simplicity. Using neural networks, we compute derivatives of the signals with respect to the astrophysical parameters and establish the most important astrophysical processes that drive the global 21 cm signal at different epochs. 21 cm VAE has a relative rms error of only 0.34%—equivalently 0.54 mK—on average, which is a significant improvement compared to the existing emulators, and a run time of 0.04 s per parameter set. The emulator, the code, and the processed data sets are publicly available at https://github.com/christianhbye/21cmVAE and through https://zenodo.org/record/5904939 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".