MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229056645 · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c01225

Ansellone J, a Potent <i>in Vitro</i> and <i>ex Vivo</i> HIV-1 Latency Reversal Agent Isolated from a <i>Phorbas</i> sp. Marine Sponge

2022· review· en· W4229056645 on OpenAlexafffund
Meng Wang, Amanda Sciorillo, Silven Read, Donya Naz Divsalar, Kwasi Gyampoh, Guorui Zu, Zhe Yuan, Karam Mounzer, David E. Williams, Luis J. Montaner, Nicole J. de Voogd, Ian Tietjen, Raymond J. Andersen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Products · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesWellcomePhiladelphia FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNew Partnership for Africa's DevelopmentSimon Fraser UniversityGovernment of the United KingdomNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAfrican Academy of SciencesGovernment of CanadaWistar InstituteWellcome Trust
KeywordsEx vivoSpongeLatency (audio)In vitroIn vivoContext (archaeology)ChemistryStereochemistryHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Activator (genetics)BiologyBiochemistryVirologyGeneticsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five new minor sesterterpenoids, ansellones H (4), I (5), J (6), and K (7) and phorone C (8), have been isolated from a Phorbas sp. marine sponge collected in British Columbia. Their structures have been elucidated by detailed analysis of NMR and MS data. Ansellone J (6) and phorone C (8) are potent in vitro HIV-1 latency reversal agents that are more potent than the reference compound and control protein kinase C activator prostratin (3). The most potent Phorbas sesterterpenoid, ansellone J (6), was evaluated for HIV latency reversal in a primary cell context using CD4+ T cells obtained directly from four combination antiretroviral therapy-suppressed donors with HIV. To a first approximation, ansellone J (6) induced HIV latency reversal at levels similar to prostratin (3) ex vivo, but at a 10-fold lower concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural ProductsSame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207