MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229075428 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2021-0228

Anatomy of the hinge region of the petiole of prostrate leaves of the wintergreen fern <i>Polystichum acrostichoides</i> (Dryopteridaceae)

2022· article· en· W4229075428 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinyan Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetiole (insect anatomy)FernBiologyEndodermisBotanyAnatomyCell wallBiophysicsGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reorientation of leaves of Polystichum acrostichoides (Michx.) Schott to a prostrate position is achieved by forming a hinge region near the base of the petiole. Anatomical details of the distal transition zone (DTZ), folding zone (FZ), and proximal transition zone (PTZ) of the hinge region were studied using light microscopy. Data showed that the vascular bundles (VBs) are intact throughout the hinge region. Towards the FZ, the DTZ and PTZ have an increasing number of cortical cells that underwent deformation and protoplast degeneration, and cell nuclei are apparent in strongly deformed cortical cells. In the FZ, the petiole is compressed, having a network of cell walls of dead cortical cells with patches of turgid cortical cells, and largely intact endodermis surrounding the VBs. The helical secondary wall thickenings of the protoxylem and scalariform thickenings of the metaxylem may contribute to the flexibility of the VBs. This study provided evidence for the deformation and degeneration of cortical cells, which is responsible for the loss of turgidity of the hinge region while their cell walls may provide cushioning during bending and insulation for the living tissues under the snowpack, illustrating a unique strategy of ferns to adapt to a cold environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207