MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229075489 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfac067.066

MO267: Traditional and Disease-Related Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Anca-Associated Vasculitis: A Prospective, Two-Centre, Observational Cohort Study

2022· article· en· W4229075489 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yosta Vegting, E. Lars Penne, Marc Hilhorst, Christian Pagnoux, Eline Houben

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioInternal medicineProspective cohort studyProportional hazards modelCohortFramingham Risk ScoreIncidence (geometry)Confidence intervalCohort studyRisk factorSurgeryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. The purpose of the present study was to asses cardiovascular risk determinants and outcomes in a two-centre prospective cohort of AAV patients. METHOD Prevalent patients diagnosed with AAV ≥ 3 months were recruited over a period of 8 months from the Northwest Clinics in the Netherlands and 3 months from the Mount Sinai Hospital in Canada, and followed for 3–5 years. A comprehensive CV risk assessment was performed at inclusion. Subjects were followed up yearly until the first cardiovascular event, death or end of follow-up, whichever came first. Cardiovascular events were assessed by an independent outcome panel. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to relate baseline characteristics to the first CV event. RESULTS A total of 144 patients were included (median age 64.6 years, male sex 56%, median BVAS score 0, median Framingham risk score 14.3%). After a median follow-up of 2.91 years, 28 non-fatal and 4 fatal CV events were registered in 16 patients. Twelve patients died of non-cardiovascular causes. The incidence of fatal and non-fatal CV events was 5.5 per 100 patient-years. In a univariable analysis an association was found between traditional risk factors and risk of CV events [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval)], including age [HR 1.08 (95% CI 1.03–1.14)], HbA1c [HR 1.59 (95% CI 1.15–2.22)], systolic blood pressure [HR 1.04, 1.01–1.06), history of CV event [HR 3.47 (95% CI 1.29–9.32)] and Framingham risk score [HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03–1.08)]. After adjusting for age and sex, HbA1c [HR 1.70 (95% CI 1.17–2.48)] and previous CV event [HR 2.90 (95% CI 1.02–8.21)] remained significantly associated with CV events. In a multivariable cox regression analysis (adjusted for Framingham risk score), a longer disease duration was associated with CV events [HR 1.08 (95% CI 1.01–1.16)]. CONCLUSION The present study is the largest prospective study on CV risk in patients with AAV and showed that CV risk was driven by both traditional and disease-related risk factors. Disease duration is associated with increased risk of CVE, but which precise disease-related factors accounts for this finding, and whether it can be acted upon remain to be determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207