MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229083058 · doi:10.1161/svin.121.000262

Experience With Neuroform Atlas Stenting as Rescue Endovascular Treatment After Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy Secondary to Intracranial Atherosclerosis

2022· article· en· W4229083058 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Orgest Lajthia, Eyad Almallouhi, Kimberly Kicielinski, Jonathan Lena, Alejandro M Spiotta, Sami Al Kasab

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleStenosisThrombolysisStentOcclusionRevascularizationStroke (engine)RadiologySurgeryCerebral infarctionInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients with emergent large vessel occlusion secondary to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis who fail mechanical thrombectomy pose a treatment challenge. The aim of this study is to report our single-center experience using the Neuroform Atlas stent as a potential rescue modality. Methods: Data were analyzed from a prospectively maintained database at a Comprehensive Stroke Center between January 2019 and September 2021 of all patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-emergent large vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and required rescue stenting with the Neuroform Atlas. We systematically gathered demographic, clinical, procedural, and functional characteristics on patients presenting with emergent large vessel occlusion within 24 hours of last known normal. The primary outcome was the rate of revascularization following stenting. Results: Twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 56.5 years, 34.6% of whom were women. On presentation, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 11 and median Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score was 9. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed using a direct aspiration, first-pass technique in all patients. Following Neuroform Atlas stent placement, 3 patients (11.5%) had moderate in-stent stenosis, while severe stenosis was encountered in 4 patients (15.4%). The rate of successful revascularization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2B-3) was identified in 92.3% of the patients. On follow-up vascular images, reocclusion occurred in 2 patients (7.7%) and symptomatic hemorrhage was encountered in 3 patients (11.5%). Excellent outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale 0-2) was achieved in 13 of 26 (50%) patients. Conclusion: Our series provides preliminary safety and efficacy data regarding the use of the Neuroform Atlas stent as a rescue modality in intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-emergent large vessel occlusion cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke Vascular and Interventional NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207