MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229334192 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2022.0100

Le territoire sauvage de l'âme by Jean-François Létourneau

2022· article· fr· W4229334192 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph A. Reiter

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeMeaning (existential)ConversationStorytellingNarrativeHistoryHumanitiesArtSociologyLiteraturePsychologyPhilosophyTheologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Le territoire sauvage de l'âme by Jean-François Létourneau Joseph A. Reiter LÉtourneau, Jean-FranÇois. Le territoire sauvage de l'âme. Boréal, 2021. ISBN 978-2-7646-2675-7. Pp. 144. This homage to the Inuit people and culture also celebrates the wilds of the province of Québec, family, fatherhood, storytelling, and (perhaps not surprisingly) hockey. Largely autobiographical, the author successfully employs and alternates two modes of narration—the singular tu, with an effective use of the present tense, to chronicle alter ego Guillaume's first years of teaching in Nunavik, and the third-person il, to recount family life with his wife and three children a decade or so later in their forest home in southern Québec. Readers might google maps to follow Guillaume's movements. Air travel was and remains the sole manner to reach Nunavik's towns, since no connecting roads exist, and once landed it is difficult for an outsider not to feel isolated or exiled. Add to this language—the Inuit of Kuujjuaq, old and young alike, communicate in Inuktitut, which Guillaume discovers during his initial flight from Montréal with a large group of teenagers. He earnestly wants to understand the conversation—"Tu aimerais leur parler, ne peux que leur sourire" (11)—but he can only guess the meaning, and over his four years in Kuujjuaq he will many times misinterpret what he hears, at times even when spoken in French. This of course will make for humorous tales he relates to his children in the prospector's tent erected in the woods behind his home. Guillaume was raised by a widowed father in the last house on a rang in a village in les Cantons de l'Est, now referred to as l'Estrie. The father told stories, sang—"un air traditionnel pour chaque moment du quotidien" (14)—chopped wood, worked the land, loved nature, and imparted that ethos to his son. Guillaume, to pay his way through college, planted hundreds of trees during summers in northern Ontario, where his yearning for the far North took hold: "Tu as voulu le Nord comme un vide à combler" (35). He does not make much headway with his students nor feel at ease for months after arriving. One Saturday night he heads to the hockey arena (Jean-François Létourneau was a champion hockey player) with skates and equipment and manages to be invited to play. His prowess stuns the players and crowd and opens the door to friendships and acceptance by the community. He will experience life with extended families, hunt caribou, camp on the tundra, learn legends, read the stars, and intensify his love for the environment and for traditional ways. Guillaume realizes he has learned much more than he was able to impart in his courses, perhaps expressing what many teachers feel: "J'ai l'impression de vous avoir pris quelque chose sans rien laisser en retour" (131). His decision to return to l'Estrie is viewed as a betrayal by the town and at departure he cannot adequately express his gratitude nor say farewell. Létourneau's poetic and poignant novel beautifully accomplishes that task: "Votre pays est magnifique, vous êtes magnifiques […] vous m'avez appris à rire. Vous m'avez appris à vivre" (131). [End Page 251] Joseph A. Reiter Phillips Exeter Academy (NH), emeritus Copyright © 2022 American Association of Teachers of French

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207