MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NERC CIP Standards

2022· book-chapter· en· W4229369060 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guillermo Francia, Eman El-Sheikh

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringWorkforceCorporationNISTCritical infrastructure protectionEngineering managementBusinessCritical infrastructureComputer scienceComputer securityPolitical scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The critical infrastructure protection (CIP) set of standards is developed by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to ensure the protection of assets used to operate North America's bulk electric systems (BES). Any entity that owns or operates any type of BES in the United States and Canada must be compliant with the requirements of the NERC CIP standards. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an ample overview of the NERC CIP standards, to describe its relevance to the protection electric utility entities, to establish its harmonizing relation with the NIST cyber security framework, to provide a glimpse of its compliance requirements, and to investigate the gaps and prospects for workforce development training in this area of critical need. This chapter lays the foundation for opportunities in the design of automated NERC CIP standards compliance processes and toolkit, the feasibility study of adopting the CIP standards in other sectors, and the development of training materials in NERC CIP standards for workforce development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.007
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in information security, privacy, and ethics book seriesSame topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207