Deposition of Organic-Inorganic Nanocomposite Coatings for Biomedical Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is a material of choice for many biomedical coating applications. However, such applications are limited due to the toxicity of the traditional solvents used for the solution processing of PMMA coatings and composites. This problem is addressed using an isopropanol-water co-solvent, which allows for the dissolution of high molecular mass PMMA and the fabrication of coatings by a dip-coating method from concentrated PMMA solutions. The use of the co-solvent offers a versatile strategy for PMMA solubilization and coating deposition, despite the insolubility of PMMA in water and isopropanol. Composite coatings are obtained, containing hydroxyapatite, silver oxide, zinc oxide, micron size silica and nanosilica. Such coatings are promising for the manufacturing of implants with enhanced biocompatibility, bioactivity and antimicrobial properties and the fabrication of biosensors. Ibuprofen, tetracycline and amoxicillin are used as model drugs for the fabrication of PMMA-drug composite coatings for drug delivery. The microstructure and composition of the coatings are analyzed. The versatile dip-coating method of this investigation provides a platform for various biomedical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it