Train operation conflict detection for high-speed railways: a naïve Bayes approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurately detecting train operation conflicts (TOC) has great significance for improving the emergency handling ability of dispatchers during interference. In this study, a conflict detection model for high-speed train operation is proposed, with the train operation data from Xiamen to Shenzhen high-speed railway. Firstly, a TOC detection model framework considering data imbalance is determined, based on Bernoulli naïve Bayes model. Then, the hyper-parameter of the proposed model is tuned with the training and validation dataset. Next, the performance result of the proposed model is compared to other three commonly used naïve Bayes models, namely the Gaussian naïve Bayes, multinomial naïve Bayes and complement naïve Bayes. Comparison analyses based on the commonly used classification model evaluation indexes show that the detection accuracy of the proposed model is significantly higher than other naïve Bayes models. The proposed model also achieves high robustness and detection accuracy in each category.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it