MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229441599 · doi:10.1155/2022/2265000

An Improved CEEMDAN-FE-TCN Model for Highway Traffic Flow Prediction

2022· article· en· W4229441599 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Heyao Gao, Hongfei Jia, Lili Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Traffic flow (computer networking)Intelligent transportation systemAlgorithmNonlinear systemFuzzy logicArtificial intelligenceDeep learningEntropy (arrow of time)Data miningWhite noiseEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of the data-driven era, deep learning approaches have been gradually introduced to short-term traffic flow prediction, which plays a vital role in the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS). A hybrid predicting model based on deep learning is proposed in this paper, including three steps. Firstly, an improved Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN) method is applied to decompose the nonlinear time series of highway traffic flow to obtain the intrinsic mode function (IMF). The fuzzy entropy (FE) is then calculated to recombine subsequences, highlighting traffic flow dynamics in different frequencies and improving prediction efficiency. Finally, the Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) is adopted to predict the recombined subsequences, and the final prediction result is reconstructed. Two sensors of US101-S on the main road and on-ramp were selected to measure the prediction effect. The results show that the prediction error of the proposed model on two sensors is notably decreased on single-step and multistep prediction, compared with the original TCN model. Furthermore, the proposed improved CEEMDAN-FE-X framework can be combined with prevailing prediction methods to increase the prediction accuracy, among which the improved CEEMDAN-FE-TCN model has the best performance and strong robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207