MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229455645 · doi:10.18280/ts.390233

HFD and MCFET Based Feature Extraction Technique for Detection of Epilepsy Using ANN Classifier

2022· article· en· W4229455645 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hemant Choubey, Sandeep Kumar Sharma, Rajendra B. Singh, Vimlesh Kumar Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceEpilepsyElectroencephalographyComputer scienceFeature extractionFractal dimensionEpileptic seizureFractalClassifier (UML)WaveletMathematicsPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A neurological disorder called Epilepsy which causes the sudden occurrence of epileptic seizures. The electroencephalogram (EEG) is the recorded electrical activities of the brain to examine the epileptic patient through EEG pattern for diagnosis. Epileptic seizure is one of the abnormality or brain disorder in which seizure patterns shows large spikes for specific time domain or area. This work mainly focused on detecting the Epileptic seizures or Epilepsy through the extracted feature like Higuchi Fractal Dimension (HFD) and Masking and Check-in based feature extraction technique (MCFET). Three scaling features of HFD viz. fractal dimension, the standard deviation of fractal dimension and scaling factor while twenty masking and check-in-based features of the upper and the lower envelope along with ten features of the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) coefficients (Table 1) from raw EEG signals are required as input to the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for classifications. The overall performance is improved in terms of Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity through both HFD and MCFET features. Further, the overall accuracy using HFD and MCFET based feature extraction technique around 98% with a bit of computational time of about 1 second by reducing the training percent from 80% to 60%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207