The roles and expression of HOXA/Hoxa10 gene: A prospective marker of mammalian female fertility?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review addresses the influence of homebox A10/a10 (HOXA/Hoxa10) gene on reproductive tract anatomy and functional fertility in mammalian species, and discusses major endocrine and environmental regulators of HOXA/Hoxa10 expression. Female reproductive efficiency or success is a function of several factors including the ovulation and fertilization rate, and uterine receptivity. A family of HOX/Hox genes establishes the segmental identity of the reproductive tract during embryogenesis and retains its physiological plasticity in sexually mature animals and humans. In particular, the HOXA/Hoxa10 gene is an intrinsic component of implantation, decidualization, and immunomodulation in the adult uterus. It was, therefore, suggested that knowledge of HOXA/Hoxa10 regulation might be essential in navigating molecular mechanisms with the aim of enhancing female reproductive potential. However, a recent study in pigs revealed a lack of associations between endometrial HOXA10 expression and reproductive tract morphology, and very poor correlations with sows' fertility metrics. Retinoic acid mainly regulates 3' HOX/Hox paralogs but may also modify the expression of downstream HOX/Hox genes, including HOXA/Hoxa10. Sex steroids directly regulate HOXA/Hoxa10 expression. The vitamin D receptor pathway modulates HOXA/Hoxa10 expression in the adult reproductive tract. Lastly, endocrine disruptors such as diethylstilbestrol, methoxychlor, bisphenol A, and isoflavones were shown to alter HOXA/Hoxa10 expression, thus affecting reproductive competence of the female.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it