On the Statherian–Calymmian palaeogeography of northwestern Laurentia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The c. 1.75 to 1.27 Ga Hornby Bay intracontinental basin, exposed in northwestern Canada, NE of Great Bear Lake, includes the Big Bear, Mountain Lake and Dismal Lakes groups. The Big Bear group comprises mainly immature clastic rocks deposited by high-energy rivers in restricted fault-bounded basins formed during the late-stage assembly of supercontinent Nuna. Detrital zircon analysis of the Big Bear group suggests provenance from a combination of local sources including recycling of sedimentary rocks, which were originally derived from sources further east, such as the Thelon orogen. The overlying Mountain Lake group was deposited by westerly flowing rivers over a much broader region, with less evidence for syndepositional faulting, suggesting thermal subsidence. It displays provenance via recycling of strata from the proximal Coronation Supergroup and the more distal and correlative Goulburn Supergroup of Kilohigok Basin. Following tectonic uplift and erosion, basal clastic rocks of the Dismal Lakes Group were deposited in fluvial and then shallow-marine to paralic environments. Detrital zircon from these strata displays prominent late Archean peaks demonstrating provenance from adjacent rocks of the Slave craton and recycling of the Mountain Lake group. Detrital zircon geochronology of sandstones from the Hornby Bay Basin supports stratigraphic correlation with the Wernecke Supergroup in the Wernecke Mountains and the Muskwa assemblage, located further southward along the ancient western margin of Laurentia. Our data, along with Nd and C isotopes from corresponding shale and carbonate units, provide robust evidence for a palaeogeographical model whereby these successions represent the terrestrial and marine components of a west-facing, passive-margin clastic wedge, considered the westward extension of an Amazon-scale, braided fluvial system that originated in the foreland of the Trans-Hudson orogen, to the east. Elements of this system have been identified from inliers in northeastern Australia, which was attached to northwestern Laurentia prior to the break-up of supercontinent Nuna. Supplementary material: U–Pb and Hf results, and Hf isotopic compositions of reference zircons are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5980940
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".