MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Molecular Systematics of Ganoderma: What Is Reishi?

2005· article· en· W4229540045 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Marc Moncalvo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of medicinal mushrooms · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGanodermaBiologyNomenclatureGenusBotanyGanoderma lucidumBasidiosporeType (biology)MushroomTaxonTaxonomy (biology)EcologySpore

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ganoderma is a very distinctive genus of white-rot polypore fungi that is primarily characterized by the formation of a double-walled, generally echinulate basidiospore. Most Ganoderma species are very variable macromorphologically and lack micromorphological distinctiveness. As a consequence, earlier taxonomic studies in the genus have created many synonymous names and have resulted in largely ambiguous species delimitation and identification systems, making species identification in the genus virtually impossible. Ganoderma strains used in oriental folk medicine refer to Reishi and have traditionally been labeled Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst. in the scientific literature. However, there is now accumulative evidence that most species reported as G. lucidum in most of the pharmacological and phytopathological studies were wrongly identified.G. lucidum was first described as Boletus lucidus by William Curtis in 1781 from a filbert plant (= Corylus avellana) in London, UK. Curtis's original collection (i.e., the type specimen) has been lost. The actual type is represented in a color plate, which is in agreement with the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. However, the typified plate is of no use for providing cultural characteristics and genetic information that would be useful for distinguishing G. lucidum from the other British laccate Ganoderma.Over the years, at least 166 laccate Ganoderma species have been described worldwide, of which at least 48 names were, at some point, considered to be synonyms of others. There is nevertheless a strong consensus about the true identity of G. lucidum among contemporary European mycologists. Molecular phylogenetic studies indicate that Ganoderma is a young genus in agreement with earlier morphological evidence as pointed out by the Norwegian mycologist Leif Ryvarden. DNA studies have shown that the G. lucidum species complex is composed of several species that can be difficult to distinguish from one another. These species include the European G. valesiacum Boud.; G. ahamdii Stey., described from Pakistan; North American G. tsugae Murrill and G. oregonense Murrill; and other taxa variously labeled G. resinaceum Boud., G. oerstedii Fr., and G. praelongum Murrill.Recent genetic and biogeographic studies have indicated that most Ganoderma species are geographically restricted. G. lucidum is probably restricted to western parts of Europe, although its distribution range can possibly also include parts of Siberia and of north western regions of China. Based on molecular phylogenetic evidence, it appears that most collections labeled G. lucidum in North America do in fact best correspond to the taxon labeled G. resinaceum in Europe, whereas G. tsugae in North America is genetically very close to the “true” G. lucidum from Europe.This leads to the question of what is the Oriental Reishi? A nonexhaustive molecular survey of taxa labeled G. lucidum in Asia, including strains commercially cultivated for the production of health tablets or teas, shows that this name has been largely misapplied and encompasses many distinct species.Incorrect taxonomic identification of Ganoderma strains hampers comprehensive strategies for drug discovery as well as for monitoring and managing diseases caused by Ganoderma in woody crops and forest ecosystems. Both molecular phylogenies and morphological evidence indicate that Africa probably harbors the highest genetic and taxonomic diversity in the genus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of medicinal mushroomsSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207