MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4229759693 · doi:10.1167/11.11.1092

The persistence of global form (Part I): Stimulus inversion influences V1 fMRI activity

2011· article· en· W4229759693 on OpenAlexaff
Lars Strother, PS Mathuranath, Cheryl Lavell, Adrian Aldcroft, Melvyn A. Goodale, Tutis Vilis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual cortexStimulus (psychology)Persistence (discontinuity)PsychologyFigure–groundPerceptionOccipital lobeVisual perceptionFunctional magnetic resonance imagingFusiform face areaCognitive psychologyNeuroscienceFace perceptionCommunicationGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human visual system uses feedforward and feedback mechanisms to achieve and maintain the figure-ground segregation of global form. One way to study figure-ground segregation is to measure the visual persistence of global form, a type of short-term perceptual memory. Studies of persistence have shown that figure-ground segregation is maintained by the visual system for up to a few seconds following the removal of perceptual binding cues that originally led to segregation. Previous studies showed persistence-related fMRI activity in human lateral occipital cortex, but failed to show persistence-related fMRI activity in V1. If persistence were observed in V1 it would suggest that feedback from high-level visual areas influence the participation of V1 in the persistence of global form. We presented observers with outlines of faces and animals that were camouflaged until they moved; these figures were either upright or inverted. We found that both upright and inverted figures persisted for up to several seconds (measured behaviorally) after they stopped moving, but that upright figures persisted longer than inverted versions of the same stimuli. We measured persistence-related fMRI activity in several occipito-temporal regions of interest (ROIs): object-selective lateral occipital cortex (LO); face-selective occipital cortex (OFA) and the fusiform face area (FFA); and several early visual ROIs (V1, V2, V3, V4v). We observed an effect of inversion on persistence in all of our ROIs, including V1. Our findings suggest that V1 fMRI activity is influenced by the orientation of an object, even though upright and inverted versions of the same figure contain equivalent low-level stimulus information. We propose that LO and other higher-tier visual areas—including the OFA and the FFA—are part of a recurrent processing network, and that these areas facilitate visual processing in V1 via feedback. We further investigate this possibility in Part II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vision→Same topicVisual perception and processing mechanisms→French-language works237,207→