MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Educational Psychology

2015· other· en· W4229798718 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEducational psychologyPsychologyField (mathematics)Psychological researchApplied psychologySchool psychologyEducational researchMathematics educationSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Educational psychology is an interdisciplinary field that uses psychological principles to understand and improve learning in and out of schools and across the lifespan, with a focus on typically developing learners. The field bridges basic and applied research, and most research considers a combination of cognitive (how people learn) and/or motivational (what energizes people to learn) variables. The field uses a range of research designs, from large‐scale international longitudinal questionnaire studies, to classroom experiments, laboratory studies, interviews, and mixed‐methods research. Clinical psychologists working with clients who present with learning or motivational difficulties at school might benefit from educational psychology findings in these areas. The entry concludes with some common theoretical constructs employed within both educational and clinical psychology, such as self‐efficacy and self‐determination theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1110.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.583
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it