Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The program committee of the North American Nietzsche Society recently elected to suspend their long-standing practice of holding group sessions in conjunction with divisional meetings of the American Philosophical Association (APA), and to organize bi-annual conferences instead. This journal will continue to bring its readers select presentations from those events. In the meantime, the seven articles in this issue represent the last of the complete Proceedings and Addresses of the North American Nietzsche Society.The first two articles, on the affirmation and the denial of life, by Guy Elgat (Northwestern University) and Daniel I. Harris (University of Prince Edward Island), were selected by the program committee from among the submissions to the Society's annual call for papers; they were delivered as presentations in St. Louis, at the Central Division Meeting of the APA on February 19, 2015, in a session chaired by Scott Jenkins. The next two, by Manuel Dries (The Open University and St. Hilda's College, Oxford) and Neil Sinhababu (National Unversity of Singapore), treat core issues of history, value, and truth in Nietzsche's early work. These presentations were invited by the program committee and delivered at a session on “Nietzsche's ‘History' Essay in Light of the Untimely Meditations Project,” chaired by R. Lanier Anderson at the Pacific Division Meeting in Vancouver, B.C. on April 3, 2015. The final three articles originated at an Author-Meets-Critics session devoted to Christian Emden's book, Nietzsche's Naturalism: Philosophy and the Life Sciences in the Late Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014). Here, Professor Emden (Rice University) replies to Brian Leiter (The University of Chicago) and Peter Kail (Oxford University), who presented their critical remarks at a session chaired by Jessica N. Berry and held in Washington, D.C. on January 9, 2016, in conjunction with the Eastern Division Meeting of the APA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it