MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229849900 · doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2015.1628

Two Sisters with Congenital Blindness caused by Osteoporosis‐pseudoglioma Syndrome due to new Mutations in the <scp>LPR</scp>5 Gene

2015· article· en· W4229849900 on OpenAlexaff
Lotte Welinder, Johane M. Robitaille, Cornelius F. Boerkoel, Rosemarie Rupps, C J Lyons

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Ophthalmologica · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlindnessMedicineOsteoporosisPediatricsGeneticsInternal medicineBiologyOptometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose To discover the reason behind two sisters being born blind with retinal detachment and microphthalmia with later findings of severe osteoporosis with low impact fractures Methods Molecular testing identified biallelic lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 5 ( LRP 5) mutations ( NM _002335.3:c. [889dupA]; [2827 + 1G4A]) confirming a diagnosis of osteoporosis–pseudoglioma ( OPPG ) syndrome. Results Two new mutations in the LPR 5 gene were each found in the unrelated parents of the girls and were found heterozygote in the girls. Both parents were then discovered to have osteopenia, as did several relatives, who all started preventive treatment. Conclusions OPPG is a autosomal recessive disease almost uniformly causing blindness from very early age with severe osteoporosis and low impact fractures, which was also the case of our two sisters. The diagnosis of OPPG was confirmed by sequencing the LPR 5 gene, where two new mutations were found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OphthalmologicaSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207