The Politics of Religion in the Age of Mary, Queen of Scots: The Earl of Argyll and the Struggle for Britain and Ireland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
and pleasing to the believer" (p.179) -was a key to both Staupitz's and Luther's spiritual development.Not unusually for one steeped in Augustine, Staupitz also leaned heavily toward predestination, which left Christ in absolute control of salvation.As for the sacraments, indulgences, and other outward signs of grace, Staupitz tended to sidestep them in favor of "personal satisfaction."Luther's decision to challenge their validity openly was but a step further.Luther quarried his cornerstones of sola fides and sola scriptura right out of Staupitz's consistent teachings, as in this posthumous formulation: "God wants nothing more from us for our salvation than faith alone" (p.307).Staupitz also convinced Luther to pursue his doctorate, the key to a preacher's skill and respect.Posset concludes that, in terms of matters both subtle and deep, "there probably would not have been the Reformation in Germany as we know it" without Staupitz (p.379).In the end, Staupitz, like Frederick the Wise, remained an admirer of Luther's efforts but not a follower of his early movement.Following Oberman, Posset characterizes this position as that of an "evangelical Catholic Reformer."He forces us to rethink the originality of many of Luther's positions and to review them in light of the long tradition of reform that lay just beneath the surface of Church consciousness in the first quarter of the sixteenth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.043 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".