Efficient algorithms for fixed-rate entropy-coded vector quantization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the quantization of any source with a nonuniform probability density function, the entropy coding of the quantizer output can result in a substantial decrease in bit rate. A straightforward entropy coding scheme presents us with the problem of the variable data rate. A solution in a space of dimensionality N is to select of subset of elements in the N-fold cartesian product of a scaler quantizer and represent them with code-words of the same length. A reasonable rule is to select the N-fold symbols of the highest probability. For a memoryless source, this is equivalent to selecting the N-fold symbols with the lowest additive self-information. The search/addressing of this scheme can no longer be achieved independently along the one-dimensional subspaces. In the case of a memoryless source, the selected subset has a high degree of structure which can be used to substantially decrease the complexity. A dynamic programming approach is used to exploit this structure. We build our recursive structure required for the dynamic programming in a hierarchy of stages. This results in several benefits over the conventional trellis-based approaches. Using this structure, we develop efficient rules (based on aggregating the states) to substantially reduce the search/addressing complexities while keeping the degradation negligible.>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".