REKONSTRUKSI DUAL BANKING SYSTEM: KEBERADAAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP SYARIAH PERBANKAN DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PERBANKAN NASIONAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The legal practice of Islamic (Sharia) economics in the real sector of Indonesia’s national economic development by way of various institutions or Islamic (sharia-based) economic centers has had a positive impact on the growth and development of the national economy. The practice is based on Islamic principles, which have been shaped into a wide variety of regulations or legislation in effect. In the legal concept of Sharia economics, the state as represented by the government that implements Sharia-based economic practices must apply the principles of Islamic economics to achieve the goal of Islamic economic law. The purpose of this Sharia economic law emphasizes the benefits for society based on the balance and fairness thus attained to present a showcase of the politics involved in Islamic economic law. The actual reality of legislation in Sharia-based economic activities issued by the government still falls decidedly short of expectations when compared to conventional economic activities and legal certainty in other countries, due to the role that Islamic economic law plays in determining the government’s political direction and ways of formalizing Islamic economic law in Indonesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".