MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230082036 · doi:10.1017/9781800100541.020

List of publications of Antonette diPaolo Healey

2020· other· en· W4230082036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Audrey Walton, Brianna Daigneault

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1976 Review of Rudolph Quirk, Old English Literature: A Practical Introduction (1975), Notes and Queries , 23, 510–11 1978 Ed., The Old English Vision of St Paul , Speculum Anniversary Monograph Series, 2 (Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America) 1979 With Angus Cameron, ‘The Dictionary of Old English’, Dictionaries , 1, 87–96 1980 With Richard L. Venezky, A Microfiche Concordance to Old English , Publications of the Dictionary of Old English, 1 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies) [on microfiche] With Richard L. Venezky, A Microfiche Concordance to Old English: The List of Texts and Index of Editions (Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto) 1981 Angus Cameron and others, with the assistance of Antonette diPaolo Healey, ‘A Reconsideration of the Language of Beowulf ’, in The Dating of Beowulf , ed. Colin Chase, Old English Text Series, 6 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), pp. 33–75 With Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos, and Sharon Butler, The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form (Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto) [on mag tape] 1985 ‘Anglo-Saxon Use of the Apocryphal Gospel’, in The Anglo - Saxons: Synthesis and Achievement , ed. J. Douglas Woods and David A. E. Pelteret (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier UP), pp. 93–104 ‘Dictionary of Old English: 1984 Progress Report’, Old English Newsletter , 18, 20–21 ‘The Dictionary of Old English and the Final Design of its Computer System’, Computers and the Humanities , 19, 245–49 With Ashley Crandell Amos, ‘The Dictionary of Old English: The Letter “D”’, in Problems of Old English Lexicography: Studies in Memory of Angus Cameron , ed. Alfred Bammesberger, Eichstätter Beiträge, 15 (Regensburg: F. Pustet), pp. 13–38 With Richard L. Venezky and Sharon Butler, Old English Concordance (Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto) [on microfiche] 1986 With Angus Cameron and others, The Dictionary of Old English: D (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies for the Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto) [on microfiche]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207