First-line PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors for platinum-ineligible advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
432 Background: FDA modified the label for the use of 1st-line pembrolizumab or atezolizumab therapy to PD-L1 high cisplatin-ineligible or platinum-ineligible UC patients (pts) regardless of PD-L1 expression. However, the outcomes when using PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors for platinum-ineligible pts are unclear. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate clinical outcomes with first-line PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors for platinum-ineligible pts with advanced UC in a real-world setting. Methods: We collected data retrospectively from 6 institutions. The following criteria were deemed to render pts platinum-ineligible although physician discretion was also allowed: Cr Cl < 30 ml/min, ECOG-PS 3, Both Cr Cl 30 to < 60 AND ECOG-PS 2. Demographic and clinical variables and outcomes (overall response rate [ORR], overall survival [OS]) were collected. A Cox regression analysis was done to study the association of baseline variables with response and survival. Results: Data were available for 45 pts. Pts received atezolizumab [n = 24], pembrolizumab [n = 11], nivolumab [n = 7] and durvalumab [n = 3]. The mean age was 72.2 (range 45-90) years. The reasons for platinum-ineligibility were: Cr Cl < 30 ml/min (n = 17), ECOG-PS 3 (n = 3), ECOG-PS 2 plus Cr Cl < 60 ml/min (n = 7), elderly with co-morbidities (n = 12), and reason was unavailable for 6 pts. The median OS was 37 weeks (CI 30-80). ORR was 27.3%: Complete response in 3 pts [6.8%], partial response in 9 pts [20.5%], stable disease in 11 pts [25%] and progressive disease in 21 pts [47.7%] and data for 1 patient was unavailable. Toxicity of any grade were seen in 42.2% of pts and Grade ≥3 toxicity in 9 pts’ [20%]. There were no treatment-related deaths. Anemia (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 - 0.92, P = 0.005) and liver metastasis (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.47 - 2.93, P = 0.017) correlated with shorter OS. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the 1st report of efficacy and toxicity of PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors as1st-line therapy for platinum ineligible UC. Data appear comparable to those reported previously in unselected cisplatin-ineligible pts receiving pembrolizumab or atezolizumab in phase II trials. Validation is needed in larger datasets and prospective trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".