MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230281617 · doi:10.1353/bcc.0.0433

Bonechiller (review)

2008· article· en· W4230281617 on OpenAlex
Deborah Stevenson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Center for Children's Books./Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser and Thermal Forming Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Bonechiller Deborah Stevenson McNamee, Graham; Bonechiller. Lamb, 2008; [304p] Library ed. ISBN 978-0-385-90895-5 $18.99 Trade ed. ISBN 978-0-385-74658-8 $15.99 Reviewed from galleys R Gr. 7–12 Since the death of his mother, Danny and his father have been moving around a lot, and the chilly emptiness of upper Ontario is Danny’s new home. Danny finds himself liking it there, bolstered by his friendship with gentle Howie, his semi-crazy older brother, Pike, and tough, beautiful Ash, who KO’ed him in the boxing ring at their first meeting, and with whom he’d like to be more than friends. Danny has bigger things to worry about, though, when a huge pale monster hunts him down one night, leaving his mark on the teen; soon Howie’s marked as well, and the friends [End Page 88] begin to realize that the monster is a historic evil that’s been seizing young people for centuries, and that soon, if they can’t figure out a way to fight back, he’ll reel Danny and Howie in to their doom. The classic elements of a good supernatural thriller are all present and accounted for here—the sympathetic protagonist-cum-victim with a haunted past, the evil with a resume dating from time immemorial and the folktales to prove it, and even the lone survivor of a past attack—and the vividly realized winter landscape makes for both a literally and figuratively chilling setting. The plot’s architecture is carefully constructed, with even seemingly throwaway details becoming relevant in the high-action climax, and Danny’s increasingly passionate relationship with Ash and his grieving for his lost mother provide additional character development and encourage greater reader investment. This will be an easy booktalk and a splendidly enjoyable read sure to please those who respond with both hope and dread when things go bump in the night. Copyright © 2008 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it