Social Housing and its Pathological Manifastations: a Case Study inPiumhi, Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the increase of the deficit of Brazilian social housing in the last years, many actions from public politics were conducted by the Federal, State and municipal governments, as the "My Home My Life" (MCMV) program, considered a solution to reduce the deficit. In Piumhi-Brazil 434 houses were built, where several pathologies were identified in most of the buildings, what contributes to reduce the quality of the life of the inhabitants. This research aims to study the quality of the buildings and presents a proposal of an initial BIM model of a building. This proposal sets an architectonic design that reaches criteria of housing, accessibility and sustainability. 273 houses were visited in 6 different housing estates in the municipality, what enabled to evaluate the conditions of the buildings. Based on the evaluation of questionnaires an architectonic design was developed considering the basic requirements from the inhabitants, updating the proposal of the standard constructed, using the software Revit for a 3D model. It is expected that the model proposed contributes to reduce the pathologies and to increase the quality of the buildings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".