Preparation and<i>in vitro</i>release behaviour of 5-fluorouracil-loaded microspheres based on poly (L-lactide) and its carbonate copolymers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractA modified oil-in-oil (o/o) emulsion solvent evaporation technique was adopted to prepare 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu)-loaded poly (L-lactide) (PLLA) or its carbonate copolymer microspheres. The disperse phase was a drug:polymer solution using a solvent mixture of N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and acetonitrile and the continuous phase was liquid paraffin containing 1–10% (w/v) Span 80®. The effects of preparative parameters, such as the composition of the inner oil phase, drug:polymer ratio, polymer concentration and agitation rate, on 5-Fu entrapment efficiency and microsphere characteristics were investigated. By introducing 25% (v/v) DMF into the inner oil phase, microspheres with high drug entrapment efficiency and an ameliorated burst effect were achieved. Using this modified method, microspheres with various particle sizes could be produced with a high 5-Fu entrapment efficiency (about 80%). In vitro drug release tests showed a burst release of 5-Fu from PLLA microspheres, followed by a sustained release over 50 days. In the case of poly (L-lactide-co-1,3-trimethylene carbonate) (PLTMC) and poly (L-lactide-co-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-trimethylene carbonate) (PLDTMC), the drug release could be continued for over 60 days.Key Words: 5-Fluorouracilpoly (L-lactide) and copolymersmicrospherescontrolled drug release
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it