MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230360128 · doi:10.1017/9781787446861.005

The Sociohistorical Cather: Approaches to Race,War, and the Environment

2020· other· en· W4230360128 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRace (biology)SociologyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I n his 1991 presidential address to the Modern Language Association, Mario J. Valdés remarked that “it is all too easy for the general public to accept the thesis that today's literary education has broken with its own tradition and now drift s in a sea of self-destruction” (428). In the 1980s and 1990s, politicians, television pundits, cultural critics, and even many literature professors found the field of literary study infiltrated by theoretical jargon and political agendas. For his part, Valdés argued for open-mindedness, reflecting that such public debates concerning what should be taught in the literary classroom represented a new opportunity for scholarly engagement with the public. In the midst of the culture wars of the 1990s, new approaches to Cather thrived. While critics of the 1930s through the 1950s viewed Cather as disengaged and apart from her cultural moment, the critics of the 1990s used new approaches to reveal a Cather very much engaged with the social and political ideas of her time. Additionally, sociohistorical critics examined how Cather’s fiction resonated with important issues from the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, including debates surrounding race and ethnicity, the United States as an imperial power in times of war, and environmental or conservation eff orts. One important tool in revealing the sociohistorical Cather was New Historicism, as many critics used nonfiction materials from Cather's lifetime as a way to illuminate how her fiction reflected, participated in, and deviated from cultural debates. New Historical and other sociohistorical readings of Cather's work flourished in the 1990s because of a confluence of forces. The publication of the Scholarly Editions of Cather's works, beginning with O Pioneers! in 1992, provided critics and scholars with reliable texts, historical materials, and publication history. International seminars dedicated to the study of Cather's work were offered routinely in the 1990s; the Cather Studies series offered scholars a means to share their work from these seminars on a regular basis. The volumes oft en invited critics to explore a particular avenue, like Cather's Canadian and Old World Connections ( Cather Studies 4 , 1999), Cather's Ecological Imagination ( Cather Studies 5, 2003), and History, Memory, and War ( Cather Studies 6, 2006).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207