MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230466658 · doi:10.4000/apad.4098

Engager l’anthropologie pour le développement et le changement social

2012· paratext· fr· W4230466658 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de l’APAD · 2012
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent numéro triple du Bulletin de l’APAD est une compilation de commuications présentées au colloque de l’APAD du 20 au 23 janvier 2012 à Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Le thème du colloque fut « Engager l’Anthropologie pour le développement et le changement social : Pratiques, discours et éthique ». Comme organisateurs principaux du colloque, nous voudrions exprimer nos remerciements à tous les acteurs et institutions qui ont soutenu le colloque : Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA), Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad (VLIR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Université de Ouagadougou, Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST), Uppsala Universitet, Université de Montréal, African Studies Centre Leiden et Katolieke Universiteit Leuven. Ce colloque de l’APAD a également reçu le soutien du Ministère des EnseignementsSupérieur, Secondaireet de la Recherche Scientifiquedu Burkina Faso.Enfin, nous ne saurons terminer cette note sans remercier tous nos collègues et amis (ils se reconnaitront!) qui se sont engagés dans le comité d’organisation du colloque de l'APAD 2010. Merci à toutes et à tous!Une mention spéciale à nos collaboratrices proches et quotidiennes Bérénice Ouattara et Gabriella Körling. Le prochain colloque de l’APAD à Montpellier, France, du 13 au 15 juin 2013 va poursuivre les réflexions entamées à Ouagadougou. A Montpellier le thème est « Les relations d’enquête en contexte de développement ou d’urgence : Accès, risques, savoirs, restitutions ». Le Bulletin de l’APAD est produit au département d’anthropologie culturelle et d’ethnologie, Université d’Uppsala. Les propositions que nous sollicitons pour notre revue concernent aussi bien des numéros thématiques que des contributions individuelles. The current triple issue of APAD Bulletin brings together a selection of papers presented at the APAD Conference 20-23 January 2010 in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. The theme of the conference was “Engaging Anthropology for Development and Social Change: Practices, Discourses and Ethics”. As conference conveners we would like to express our deepest thanks to all actors and institutions that supported the conference: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA), Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad (VLIR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Bobo-Dioulasso Polytechnical University, Ouagadougou University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST), Uppsala University, Université de Montréal, African Studies Centre Leiden and Katolieke Universiteit Leuven. The conference was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Burkina Faso. And last but never least we would like to thank colleagues and friends (you know who you are!) in the organisation committee of the APAD 2010 OUAGA. Bravo! A special thanks to our close, daily collaborators Bérénice Ouattara and Gabriella Körling. The upcoming APAD conference in Montpellier, France, 13-15 June 2013 will follow up the Ouagadougou conference. In Montpellier, the theme is “Fieldwork relations in the context of Development or Emergency: Access, risks, knowledge, restitutions”. The APAD Bulletin is produced at the Department of Cultural Anthropology & Ethnology, Uppsala University. We welcome proposals of special issues, as well as individual papers, to be published in our journal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de l’APADSame topicAfrican Studies and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207