MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230561836 · doi:10.1051/shsconf/20197000001

Editorial

2019· editorial· es· W4230561836 on OpenAlex
Irina Abakumova, Olga Fedotova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSHS Web of Conferences · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology of Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Don State Technical University (Rostov on Don, Russian Federation) from 22 to 23 November 2019.The main goal of the International Conference was to identify and characterize the current worldwide trends in the development of psychological and pedagogical education in the conditions of dynamic entry into the system of world relations of different countries at the stages of transition to new technological, economic, politic and social structures.The International Conference provided a platform where scientists representing different disciplines have been able to meet and discuss academic and research topic of common interests.That conference has five specific objectives as follows:1. to set up a platform for interdisciplinary discussion about the current stage of the development of education and science in the conditions of transformation of the socio-economic, socio-political structure and technological changes;2. to discuss the relevant psychological and pedagogical projections reflecting the influence of the ideas of postmodernism on the situation of the transition to an education system with a relatively stable structure;3. to develop the modern methodological approaches to the study of new psychological and pedagogical phenomena that arise in a transitive society;4. to study the features of the conceptual-semantic apparatus and interval-moment structures reflecting various types of transitivity in the system of psychological and pedagogical education; 5. to discuss the possibilities of taking into account the influence of the transitive trends in the system of psychological and pedagogical education at the current stage.These issues cover a wide range of topics related to educational and cross-cultural communication, as demonstrated by the following section headings of the conference: 1) Newdidactics: Dialogue of cognitive and semantic approach; 2) Cross-border education in the modern world; 3) Priority areas of professional training and education in digital economy; 4) The motivational aspect of control and evaluation activities in education; 5) Philosophy of Education: Challenges of the new methodology; 6) The meeting of generations in educational space; 7) Organizational psychology and management psychology as a resource for the development of society in the context of global changes; 8) The psychology of education in the face of changes: risks and challenges of innovation; 9) Psychophysiology and clinical psychology: theory and practice 10) Strategic directions in the development of education and social and labor rehabilitation of people with special educational needs; 11) The main trends and prospects for the development of regulatory legal regulation of state policy in the field of education in a transitive society.These and other issues were addressed from both practical and theoretical perspectives.The International Conference also aimed at establishing linkages between high school teachers and researchers who work in the fields of psychology, educational sciences, philosophy, sociology, history and law.Authors of papers were mainly from various regions of the Russian Federation as well as authors from Armenia, Canada, China, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Syria and the other countries.We would like to thank everyone who contributes to all processes involved in the making of that conference as international event, to the Organizing Committee members, session chairs, presenters, and all those who helped with technical issues.We would like that conference to become a platform for the further discussions and cooperation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it