MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4230627758 · doi:10.12927/hcq..18814

Quarterly Change

2007· article· en· W4230627758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reports Measuring UpWhile the federal, provincial and territorial governments are making gains on some commitments to renew healthcare, Canadians are not getting the detailed information they need to measure progress in improving healthcare, the Health Council of Canada concluded in its recently released annual report to Canadians.The report tracks the progress governments have made in meeting such commitments as reforming primary healthcare, reducing wait times and health inequalities, modernizing health information systems and improving drug coverage.While there is good news to share, the Health Council emphasized the lack of comparable data and the prevalence of inconsistent or incomplete reporting across the country.First Ministers did not report on comparable health indicators this year, as they had agreed to do, and the federal/provincial/territorial committee that oversees this work has been disbanded.Information about how provinces and territories spend targeted federal funds is not easily accessible, or in some cases, not available at all.Without better data, jurisdictions will fall short of their commitment to more transparent public reporting and greater accountability.www.healthcouncil canada.ca/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id =136&Itemid=115 Emergency Physicians Release Recommendations on Emergency Department OvercrowdingIn response to public concern with delays in emergency departments and the impact of overcrowding and wait times on the health of Canadians, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians has issued a new position paper on emergency department overcrowding.The paper includes recommendations to address the immediate situation in Canada's emergency departments, as well as some solutions for the longer-term.For instance, the paper suggests implementing national length-of-stay benchmarks and overcapacity protocols, which would share the responsibility for already admitted hospital patients within all wards of the hospital instead of "warehousing" them in emergency departments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2770.110

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Quarterly→Same topicEmergency and Acute Care Studies→French-language works237,207→