Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Don B. Wilmeth and Christopher Bigsby, ed., The Cambridge History of American Theatre, Vol II: 1870-1945, reviewed by Barry B. Witham Annemarie Bean, ed., A Sourcebook of African-American Performance: Plays, People, Movements, reviewed by David Krasner Alice Griffin and Geraldine Thorsten, Understanding Lilian Hellman, reviewed by Judith E. Barlow Brenda Murphy, Congressional Theatre: Dramatizing McCarthyism on Stage, Film and Television, reviewed by Jonathan Chamber s Philip Auslander, Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, reviewed by Dorothy Chansky Tracy C. Davis and Ellen Donkin, eds., Women and Playwritting in Nineteenth-Century Britian, reviewed by Jennifer Jones Dominic Shellard, ed., British Theatre in the 1950s, reviewed by Susan Bennett Dominic Shellard, British Theatre Since the War, reviewed by Susan Bennett Philip Roberts, The Royal Court Theatre and the Modern Stage, reviewed by Susan Bennett Gabriella Giannachi and Mary Luckhurst, ed., On Directing: Interviews with Directors, reviewed by Jennifer Harvie Tim Etchellis, Certain Fragments: Contemporary Performance and Forced Entertainment, reviewed by Andrew Houston Elaine Aston, Feminist Theatre Practice: A Handbook, reviewed by Ann M. Fox
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.426 | 0.440 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".