MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New Methods for Carbon-Carbon Bond Construction

2013· book-chapter· en· W4230697413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglass F. Taber

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryStereocenterNitrileTriple bondWittig reactionStereochemistryOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryCatalysisDouble bondEnantioselective synthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sunggak Kim of KAIST reported (Synlett 2009, 81) an improved protocol for the one-carbon free radical homologation of an iodide such as 1 to the nitrile. Primary, secondary, and tertiary iodides work well. We described (Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2462) a procedure for the one-carbon homologation of a halide 4 directly to the benzyl ether 6. Bin Xu of Shanghai University showed (Chem. Commun. 2009, 3246) that conversion of a ketone 8 to the 1,1-dibromoalkene set the stage for the net one-carbon homologation to the amide 9. A. Fernández-Mateos of the Universidad de Salamanca uncovered (J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3913) a powerful new branching reaction, condensing the more substituted center of an epoxide 10 with a nitrile 11 to deliver the adduct 12. Useful diastereocontrol was observed with cyclic epoxides. Uli Kazmaier of the Universität des Saarlandes optimized (Adv. Synthy. Cat. 2009, 351, 1395) a Mo catalyst for the hydrostannation of a terminal alkene 13 to the branched product 14. Dong-Mei Cui of the Zhejiang University of Technology and Chen Zhang of Zhejiang University (both in Hangzhou) developed (Chem. Commun. 2009, 1577) a complementary procedure, converting the terminal alkene 15 into the branched alkenyl tosylate 16. The Wittig reaction is notorious for racemizing sensitive aldehydes. Hélène Lebel of the Université de Montréal demonstrated (Organic Lett. 2009, 11, 41) a simple one-pot protocol for sequential oxidation and homologation of 17 that preserved the integrity of the adjacent stereogenic center. The stereocontrolled construction of trisubstituted alkenes is still a major issue in organic synthesis. Giancarlo Verardo of the University of Udine established (J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2009, 22, 24) that the α-diazo ester 19, readily prepared directly from the simple ester, was converted by I2 to the alkene 20 with high geometric control. Condensation with the Ohira reagent 22 is often the method of choice for converting an aldehyde into the homologated alkyne. Hubert Maehr and Milan Uskokovic of Bioxell and Carl P. Schaffner of the Waksman Institute described (Syn. Commun. 2009, 39, 299) an optimized, scalable procedure for the in situ preparation of 22 and the conversion of 21 to 23. Note, again, that the sensitive stereogenic center adjacent to the intermediate aldehyde was not epimerized under the reaction conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicAdvanced Synthetic Organic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207