Bibliographic record
Abstract
of sell and display of attitude, 228-231 Affectivity, 173 African Americans, 25-26 Age of Reason (1947), 56-57 Agency, 22 complementarity, 22 of sell, 232-234 American Motorcycle Association (AMA), 119 Analytic memos, 117 Anamnesis principle, 154-155 Anger, 104-105 Anhedonia, 117-118 Anti-stigma, 200 Art worlds, 135 Asylums, 188 Attitude, 226-228 Autobiography, 75, 78, 81 autobiographical writings, 75, 84, 89 as autotherapy, 91-92 Autoethnographers, 77-78 Autoethnography, 75, 77-78, 110 Autoethnograpic dialogue, 74 Awareness, 46, 49 Axon, 2-6 Axon Canada, 8 claims, 7 findings, 9-13 methodology, 6-8 Black college men, 100 Body-worn cameras (BWCs), 1-3 market, 2 research on, 4-6 Camera, 7-8 Career conceptualization, 135-136 of young physicians, 136 Charmaz's approach, 156 Chief Executive Officer (CEO), 9 Chronicle of Higher Education, 111-112 Circularity Objection, 67-68 Classic grounded theory, 157, 167 Clothing identity program, 224 Cloud-based evidence strategy, 4 Coding procedure, 153-154, 165-166 Coercive status silencing, 103, 108 Colonization of mind, 20-21 Commitment, 56-57 Comparative thinking, 169 Conceptual frameworks, 19-20 Confessions, 74-76, 78-79, 81, 84-86, 89 Conflicted status silencing, 103 Consciousness raising, 27 Constructivist grounded theorists, 157 Constructivist grounded theory, 156 Consumers, 228, 231 Contemplation/reflection, 159-160 Contemplative grounded theory (CGT).See also Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM), 152-153 coding procedure, 165-166 deconstruction of concepts, 163-165 237 epoché in grounded theory, 166-174 inspirations, 156-162 participants/collaborators of research, 163 Contemplative qualitative inquiry, 161-162 Contemplative studies, 156 Conviviality, dramas of, 210-211 Cooley, Charles Horton, 64-65 Correctional Service Canada, 198 Cost Saving, 11-13 Coventry, 214 Creative writing breakthroughs, 55-56 Criminality ,[194][195] 197 CSC policy, 198
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.821 | 0.838 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".