Bibliographic record
Abstract
A few families rose to prominence [in Baptist churches in Nova Scotia], created an aristocracy of the faith, and often held the church to more than ordinarily frozen and conservative theological and social positions. Winks 346 Winks’s reading of African-Canadian history exhibits, purely, a small-l liberal, American bias. I would need an entire book to amend—one by one—his false precepts ... African-Canadian ‘progress’ must be read against Canadian cultural norms, not American ones. Clarke,Odysseys Home 63^4n9 Preamble In formulating a vision of The Black Atlantic, Paul Gilroy makes sorties against anti-essentialists who ignore the appeal of a ‘‘powerful, populist affirmation of black culture,’’ ‘‘racial conservationists who veer between a volkish, proto-fascist sensibility and the mistyeyed sentimentality of those who would shroud themselves in the supposed moral superiority that goes with victim status’’ (100, 101). Canadian scholars have found Gilroy’s work instructive. In Odysseys Home, George Elliott Clarke insists upon the ‘‘necessary attractiveness of cultural nationalism for any minority that feels itself downtrodden and disrespected’’ while warning of the ‘‘hazards of nationalism—its tendency to decay into fallacious myths, misty romanticisms, and blood-rite fascism’’ (183, 184). Yet Clarke does not only condemn the ‘‘liberal lies’’ of Robin Winks—the ‘‘American’’ (30, 124n9, 189) or ‘‘US’’ (155) author of The Blacks in Canada—and ‘‘those wanna-be black nationalists who suspect mixed-race or light-skinned blacks of being congenital .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".