Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laura Engel, Fashioning Celebrity: Eighteenth-Century British Actresses and Strategies for Image Making, reviewed by Jennie Batchelor Shelley King and Yaël Schlick, Refiguring the Coquette: Essays on Culture and Coquetry, reviewed by Ann Shteir Claude Rawson, Politics and Literature in the Age of Swift, reviewed by Aaron Santesso Elisabeth Krimmer and Patricia Anne Simpson, Enlightened War: German Theories and Cultures of Warfare from Frederick the Great to Clausewitz, reviewed by Viktoria Harms Jacques Cormier, L’Atelier de Robert Challe (1659–1721), reviewed by Patrick Coleman Jean-François Perrin, Politique du renonçant: Le dernier Rousseau des “Dialogues” aux “Rêveries”, reviewed by Guillemette Johnston Christopher D. Johnson, New Contexts for Eighteenth-Century British Fiction: “Hearts Resolved and Hands Prepared”: Essays in Honor of Jerry C. Beasley, reviewed by Heather Ladd Michael Hoskin, Discoverers of the Universe: William and Caroline Herschel, reviewed by Randall Brooks Tiffany Potter, Ponteach, or the Savages of America: A Tragedy by Robert Rogers, reviewed by Robbie Richardson Loic Thommeret, Aza ou le Nègre, Critique littéraire par Marie-Hélène Huet
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.501 | 0.582 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".