MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230823457 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-47967/v1

Clinical and Endoscopic Characteristics of Chinese Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Study of 103 cases

2020· preprint· en· W4230823457 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuanyuan Lu, Fengxing Huang, Youwei Wang, Juan Zhou, Qiu Zhao, Lan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEtiologyGastroenterologyInternal medicineDysplasiaRetrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)DiseaseDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a rare non-inherited disease characterized by extensive gastrointestinal polyposis and ectodermal dysplasia. Its etiology still remains indefinite to us. Currently, the diagnosis is mainly based on typical clinical manifestations and endoscopic features. However, there is a lack of these information from Chinese CCS patients. Our study was to investigate the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of Chinese CCS patients. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 103 Chinese CCS patients (102 cases from literature and 1 case from our department). Their clinical and endoscopic data were collected, and statistical analyses were performed. Results: 1) In Chinese population, people aged 50-70 years (62.62%) had a high incidence of CCS, and the ratio of male-to-female was 2.68:1. 2) The diverse range of gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations were observed in all the patients, and the most common symptoms were weight loss (98.80%) and loss of appetite (93.94%). Almost all the patients had at least one symptom of ectodermal dysplasias. 3) All CCS patients presented multiple polyps in the GI tract except esophagus. The size of polyps varied from 0.5 cm (88.64%) to 0.6-1.0 cm (81.82%) . The polyps were various in shapes, the most of them were nodular polyps (58.14%) ,what’s more,the sessile polyps were the most common(90.24%). Congestion, edema and erosion were very common on the surface of polyps (96.83%) and the surrounding mucosa (85.71%) . 4) The common pathological features of polyps were hyperplastic polyps (49.25%) and tubular adenomatous polyps (44.78%). There is only 5.97% cancer reported. Conclusions: middle-aged and elderly people are the high-risk group; various gastrointestinal symptoms are observed in Chinese patients; the typical endoscopic finding is multiple small sessile polyps; these gastrointestinal polyps has a chance of malignant potential. Long-term endoscopic surveillance and follow-up are recommended for the CCS patients in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207