MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230854504 · doi:10.2118/170021-ms

Selection of Optimal Solvent Type for High Temperature Solvent Applications in Heavy-Oil and Bitumen Recovery

2014· article· en· W4230854504 on OpenAlex
Andrea Marciales, Tayfun Babadagli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAsphalteneSolventMixing (physics)DiffusionViscosityPrecipitationYield (engineering)Light crude oilAsphaltMaterials scienceChemical engineeringChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The selection of most suitable solvent for an efficient heavy-oil recovery process is a critical task. Low carbon number solvents yield faster diffusion but the mixing quality may not be high. Also, high carbon number solvents yield a better qulity mixing (much less asphaltene precipitation) but the mixing process is rather slow. Hence, the understanding of solvent selection criteria for solvent-aided recovery processes has established two main aspects of oil-solvent interaction: (1) Oil-solvent mixture quality and (2) rate of mixture formation. Oil-solvent mixture quality is determined by two parameters: (1) Viscosity and (2) asphaltene precipitation. The rate of mixture formation is quantified by the diffusion rate. These two parameters need to be quantitatively and qualitatively determined to select the suitable solvent for heavy-oil recovery also supported by static experiments that measure solvent diffusion (and oil recovery) from a rock saturated with heavy-oil and exposed to solvent diffusion at static conditions. This paper focuses on these tests and uses three oil samples with a wide range of viscosities (250-153, 000 cp), and three liquid solvents with different carbon numbers varying between C7 and C13. The methodologies applied for diffusion rate measurement were optical applying image analysis under UV light (for processed -mineral- oil) and CT scanning (for heavy-oil obtained from fields). Next, viscosity and asphaltene precipitation measurements were conducted after mixing the crude oil and solvents to quantify the mixing quality. Then, core experiments were performed on Berea sandstone samples using the same solvent-heavy oil pairs to obtain the optimum carbon size (solvent type)-heavy oil combination that yields the highest recovery factor and the least asphaltene precipitation. Based on the fluid-fluid (solvent-heavy oil) interaction experiments and heavy-oil saturated rock-solvent interaction tests, the optimal solvent type was determined considering the fastest diffusion and best mixing quality for different oil-solvent combinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it