MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230885559 · doi:10.4095/308296

Geoenvironmental characteristics of Canadian critical metal deposits

2018· report· en· W4230885559 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael B. Parsons

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyEnvironmental scienceMining engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in the global demand for many elements used in green energy and high-tech applications, including antimony (Sb), cobalt (Co), indium (In), lithium (Li), niobium (Nb) and the rare earth elements (REE). Canada has abundant resources of these critical elements, however, we know very little about the potential environmental impacts of mining these resources. The primary objective of this study is to characterize processes controlling the mobility of trace elements and radionuclides in mine wastes and waters at the abandoned St. Lawrence Columbium (SLC) Mine in Oka, Quebec. This mine operated from 1961 to 1976 and at the time was one of the largest Nb producers in the world. In FY 17-18, GSC scientists continued sampling mine wastes, groundwater and surface waters at the SLC Mine and initiated collaborative projects with the University of Ottawa (slag leaching) and Queen's University (waste rock weathering). Results to-date show that most REEs, uranium (U) and thorium (Th) occur in relatively insoluble minerals, but that the slag is reactive and a potential radiological hazard. Radionuclide levels in mine waters are very low, but elevated levels of fluoride are present in seepage from the tailings. GSC data on slag, groundwater, and pit lake chemistry were shared with the Quebec Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources to help inform ongoing environmental management decisions for the SLC Mine. Results were also shared in a plain language fact sheet, and in both national and international conference presentations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207